CCMA Concilliation - 23 March

Dear Comrades

The CWU HQ's Cde Agnes has referred a dispute on my behalf to the CCMA. There will be a concilliation meeting on 23 March, at which the SABC's representative (Andre Weber) should bring the mandate of the GCEO, Mr Solly Mokoetle, to the table.

I am asking for re-instatement. Please be so kind as to ask Mr Mokoetle to set some time aside for a loyal SABC servant who wishes to return to work in order to help him expose more corruption and victimisation.

I request that he mandates the ER department to re-instate me. Any grievances the CPO has with me (unfounded), should then be resolved during a grievance resolution meeting, which has never happened. No one has ever asked me to clarify anything.

I have not been paid for 2 months now, but still spend a large part of my day being an activist for what is right at the SABC.

I will never give up - but need your help - feel free to email me at rian.geldenhuys@gmail.com, or to comment on this post.

Your Comrade forever
Rian Geldenhuys

Public Interest

Kaizer Kganyago told reporters that "SABC Employee Disputes" are not in the public interest.

He is misguided in this statement. When the public want to know why a competent, well loved newsreader is suddenly taken off air, they have the right to know. It is in the public's interest to know. News is in the public interest.

Similarly, when a whistleblower on corruption in the Public Broadcaster is dismissed, the public has the right to know why.

This reporter can at least venture a learned opinion. People who question gangsters are silenced at such a rapid pace that it really is not newsworthy any more. Sad.

Retrenchment talk

The Minister of Communication has referred to the SABC as being "Staff Heavy". Comrades, it is very urgent that you provide the Shop Stewards Council with information on your top heavy line management:
1. Are they needed?
2. What is their actual contribution to the SABC?
3. Do they get the best out of their staff?

These reports are required by your Shop Steward - let us make sure the real dead wood (expensive managers) are retrenched. We must mobilise against any attempts to reduce numbers in the bargaining unit - we are here to work.

If anyone must be retrenched, it should be those outside the bargaining unit.

Message to Mr Solly Mokoetle

If indeed it is so that Mr Mokoetle does not have the time to hear Comrade Rian Geldenhuys' appeal, we request that he at the very least promises protection for Mr Simon Swart, who is today, Wednesday 3 February 2010, burdened with making one of the most difficult decisions ever.

1. Do the right thing, and stand up against communist wife

2. Do the wrong thing, and support communist wife in her unlawful quest to silence all critics, Orwelian style.

Mr Swart - please take the right decision or, once again, the only winners will be the lawyers. They already have enough money. The SABC needs that money more than they do. Please save the SABC a fortune, and stand up against the fat cats pretending to be for the people.

Collective Bargaining

Comrades

The CWU Plant Executive needs your go-ahead on the following:

1. We want the SABC to PRIMARILY communicate all matters of mutual interest directly with the Plant Secretariat and Executive (whether it's Cde Tommy, Cde Rian or the Acting Plant Secretary, Cde Mimi).

2. Communication should be copied to CWU HQ, the Broadcasting and Allied Co-ordinator, Vulture, and the General Secretary, Gallant Roberts.

3. We need to mandate a member elected team in terms of the CWU office, and communicate the point of contact to the SABC. We feel that the point of contact should be immediately able to disseminate information to members, and HQ is not as able to do that as the Plant Secretariat is.

Please comment - the Plant Executive will be the communication hub for the union at SABC, and this is aimed entirely at improving communication channels, not at replacing union HQ. Effective communication is absolutely vital!

UPDATE ON CDE RIAN'S CASE: He will get to hear the sanction from the panel tomorrow at 14:00. Note that the panel now consists only of two members as the third is on suspension pending investigations.

Interim Board Fails - YAQAR

Yet Another Qualified Audit Report!

The embattled owners of the National Broadcaster (the Viewing Public) has been disappointed yet again by the Directorate of the SABC. Earlier this year, an Interim Board was appointed by the President to resolve non compliance issues at our broadcaster. They have however failed to deliver a proper audit report, for the following reasons:
  1. The Interim Board is "in the process" of taking the appropriate action regarding the AG’s special investigation on procurement, fruitless and wasteful expenditure and non-compliance with company policies.

  2. The external Auditors were unable to determine:
a. Whether the various allegations and other matters that are still being investigated have an impact on the financial position, the financial performance and cash flows as disclosed in the financial statements.
b. Whether the disclosure of fruitless and wasteful and irregular expenditure is complete as there has been non-compliance with Section 51 (1)(b)(ii) of the PFMA.

3. From the External Auditor's report:

In accordance with our responsibilities in terms of sections 44(2) and 44(3) of the Auditing profession Act of South Africa, we report that we have identified certain unlawful acts or omissions committed by persons responsible for the management of the SABC which constitute reportable irregularities in terms of the Auditing Profession Act, and have reported such matters to the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors. The matters pertaining to the reportable irregularities have been described in the reportable irregularity paragraph in the Directors’ Report.


The Viewing Public therefore asks:

Why did the Interim Board - and the Audit Committee Members they seconded at high cost - not do their job?

Finally - a real broadcast professional as CEO

SABC Employees welcome back Mr Mokoetle, and pledge full co-operation with all decisions required - however drastic - to make the SABC a genuine Employer of Choice for us, the SABC Employees who care about Broadcasting.

We request Mr Mokoetle not to waste a moment getting rid of those who are using the Broadcaster for personal power and gain, and to retain those who contribute selflessly to Broadcasting. We can assist to help make this distinction, via our Union Leadership - the Shop Stewards Council.

Viva good labour relations viva!

We further welcome Dr. Ben Ngubane as Chair of the Board - but sincerely hope Mr Cedric Gina will be allowed to prove how real Labour Relations can transform a workplace, and that Mr Desmond Golding will be allowed to complete the long outstanding matters still to be audited.

Cde Rian found guilty on all 4 charges

The DC panel today found our Plant Secretary guilty of:

1. Inciting friction between Top Management (specifically the CPO) and staff
2. Contravention of Personnel Regulation 2(d) - List of Concerns from Organised Labour
3. Misrepresentation of fact (using Corporate Logo without permission) - email asking staff to join unions
4. "Pretending" to be a Shop Steward, while his form was not yet processed by SABC

We find the above quite ridiculous, but quite expected from the well known bias of Alan Visser, Tseliso Leballo and Merlyn Ashen. A leopard never changes his spots, but his day will come...

Debt Collection most Crucial for SABC Survival

We call upon all Comrades in the Audience Services Division to participate in the crucial effort to get back monies that are owing to the SABC - and we are not talking licence fee defaulters now.

We require a shift in focus - if we have to wait for the external parties to come to our aid - it will be too late.

The SABC must save itself. It has the people power to do so.

Here is what we ask:

That the entire Audience Services Division assist with debt collection strategies, from the following debtors:

  1. Corrupt managers who have stolen from the SABC.
  2. Corrupt managers who have given work to family, friends and lovers.
  3. Corrupt managers who have wasted public money via Wasteful Expenditure.
  4. Corrupt managers who have hired their friends and girlfriends - at great expense.
  5. Corrupt managers who spend their time womanising, instead of working.
  6. Corrupt managers who never did anything, knowing the thieves are busy destroying us.
  7. Corrupt managers who spend their days in lavish lunches with suppliers.
  8. Corrupt managers who get spiked with alcohol, women or golf memberships by suppliers.
  9. Girlfriends and friends of the above, who should not have taken a salary for doing nothing.
  10. Suppliers who have been bribing the above.

Comrades, we await your offers of assistance, and comments on how you can add your huge potential value to the SABC in this regard. Harrassing old, poor people for a licence fee really is a waste of your immense talents. The Ministry of Communications agree.

My DC

Dear Comrades

I wish to express my sincere thanks to the support I have received from the CWU Shop Stewards Council so far. If we lose this DC, it would be because the panel have been instructed to get me out of top management's way.

Unfortunately, the DC has again been postponed. I apologise to the witnesses Cde Mimi has lined up for me - she and Cde Tommy are doing sterling work in this regard. We shall inform you of the date ASAP. Thanks also to Cde Ben for allowing me as author on this blog.

Please email me on rian.geldenhuys@gmail.com if you too would like to write on this blog.

Please create a gmail account before you do so. I shall forward your requests to Cde Ben, who needs to remain anonymous at this time.

The Magnificent Nine

Hlaudi Motsoeneng, a known victimiser, was fired from SABC in 2008, after investigations against him by the Head of News, the result of a long and hard struggle by unions in Free State.

The unions' joy was short-lived, however, when the shocking Dali Mpofu simply re-instated him, allowing him to run rampant along with the rest of the gang in Bloemfontein. SABC board, after complaints by the unions and Head of News, engaged Mpofu over this clearly illegal cover-up. Mpofu reacted by immediatly suspending the Head of News, and declaring war on the Board.

The board, in its ineptitude, the suspended Mpofu in turn. Both these suspensions were unprocedural, the only procedural one was the one the unions had asked for - that of Hlaudi Motsoeneng, the arrogant and "connected" victimiser.

The "MAGNIFICENT SEVEN":
1. Chief People Officer Phumelele Ntombela-Nzimande,
2. Head of Content Enterprises Mvuzo Mbebe,
3. Head of Group Strategy and Risk Sipho Sithole,
4. Legal Services Head Thabang Mathibe,
5. Public Broadcasting Services head Thami Ntenteni,
6. Acting chief operations officer Charlotte Mampane and
7. SABC spokesman Kaizer Kganyago.,

All proceeded to protest illegally against the board, and started a smear campaign the likes of which has never before been seen. All for Hlaudi and Dali.

Mkhonza commissioned a consultant to conduct a probe into the actions of the seven executives.
The report gave the green-light for action to be taken against ALL SEVEN. The report says the conduct by the executive managers involved was disruptive in the operations of the public broadcaster. "This action by these managers is in contravention of the National Key Point Act application to the corporation. This suggests that these managers are a threat to the SABC as per the provisions of the National Key Point Act. The behaviour of the seven executives to mobilise and defy the board's directive(s) during the suspension of (Mpofu) is serious and tantamount to misconduct. It encourages ordinary employees to mobilise or revolt against the highest competent authority, the board. "The outcome may be the dysfunctional and ungovernable SABC culminating in the loss of confidence by (the) public in the public broadcaster. The board may consider inviting the (police) Crime Intelligence (unit) together with the (National Intelligence Agency), to conduct screening of certain employees who may pose a threat to the SABC in terms of the National Key Point Act.

Here is the question:

WHAT MAKES THEM UNTOUCHABLE? WHO ARE THEY CONNECTED WITH? WATCH THIS SPACE.

R200m bailout a waste of taxpayer's money

We are very concerned that instead of seizing the assets of the people who are being investigated, government decides to use taxpayers money to cover up the fact that the thieves and wasters must return the money.

The extreme reluctance of the Interim Board Chair to do this, means that she too is wasting taxpayer money. Law dictates that all instances of alleged fraud must be investigated by SAPS and the assets forfeiture unit must safeguard those assets.

It may be time to mobilise - as it is the only proven way.

Please comment

Unconstitutional SABC rule

Kindly note that after extensive consultations with our legal teams, and in light of the recent ruling on "source protection" SABC vs Sunday Times, we declare SABC personnel regulation 2 unconstitunional, in where it is abused to prevent protected disclosures and disclosures to the shareholder and public.

Not Enough!

Robin Nicholson, Mvuso Mbebe, Anton Heunis and Mabela Satekge have been asked to supply reasons to the interim SABC board why they should not be suspended.

A senior insider sympathetic to the four said the allegations against the executives would not "stick" if placed under scrutiny of the Public Finance Management Act. It is understood that a particular source of frustration for some of those in the firing line is that the auditor general has selected certain allegations to pursue while ignoring others.

The executives claim they had to find ways to deal with new technology and be 100% compliant after the SABC threw out its old accounting system and replaced it in 2007 with SAP.

They are understood to be objecting that they were not given a chance to read the auditor general's report or defend themselves before it was released to the media. They now believe they are the victims of "a trial by media", in violation of their rights. Nonsense - their replies were in the report!

The SABC reported a financial loss of R839-million for the 2008/09 year and has asked the government for a R2-million bailout.

Nicholson has so far survived purges. But as the subject of five major investigations and 130 complaints during his term of office, he is known to be under heavy stress. He declined to comment on the latest controversy. "I will not comment on personal matters or my contract with the SABC," said Nicholson. "What I can say is that nobody has been suspended."

The auditor general found many instances of inadequate financial controls, including:
Nicholson signed an agreement with a consultant to provide services in connection with SABC's asset and liability risk management committee. The consultant was paid past the expiry of the contract and no evidence was found that quotations were invited during the procurement process, or of a competitive process.

The same consultant proposed its services as a debt originator and the SABC was invoiced for services rendered to the value of R100 000 in April and May 2009, without a signed contract. Nicholson accepted the proposal without following the correct processes, according to the auditor general.

The SABC entered two management consultancy agreements with a service provider at great cost. One was to develop and implement a "communication plan for the office of the chief financial officer" for a 12-month period. The contract for the period July 15 2008 to July 2009 was worth R1.15-million.

The same consultant invoiced the SABC for professional services rendered to the broadcaster's financial control division for "transition management" for the period January 2008 to September 2008. The cost was R1,2-million. No agreement could be submitted for the professional services rendered.

20 employees were directors or members of 20 companies or close corporations which had received payments from the SABC to the amount of approximately R3,4-million, which was a contravention of the SABC's group supply-chain management policy.

According to the auditor general, a legal firm appointed to conduct a forensic investigation of programming concluded in August 2009 that there were irregularities of some R111,7-million relating to double payments, overpayments, material paid for but not received, agreements that had to be renegotiated and programme titles acquired more than once from the same supplier during the same licence period.

The PFMA directs that those transgressions, and others, were to be reported to SAPS, both by Internal Audit, and the GCEO (Acting). That was not done, which is a transgression of law.

Ministry to Babysit EXCO

The board will immediately act on all the AG's findings on HR and wasteful expenditure at SABC - by instituting legal /criminal proceedings against perpetrators.

It is in full agreement with AG that the underlying causes have been:

  • Lack of quality reporting, governance arrangements and leadership oversight
  • Inadequate monitoring and oversight by the leadership of the SABC
  • The creation of an environment where "the tone at the top" is “inappropriate”.
  • A culture where management is not focused on public accountability or acting
    in the best interest of the SABC".

Some Findings:

  • At least 34 employees were suspended for an average of 10.4months - in some cases for up to 39 months - on full pay, at a cost of R8.3-million
  • 7 tenders awarded for an aggregate amount of R174-million were NOT approved by the appropriate levels stipulated in the delegation of authority framework.
  • 20 employees at the broadcaster are directors or members of companies that had received payments from the SABC to the amount of R3,4-million.
  • 2 contract awards amounting to R8,4-million and R8,2-million, were not approved in accordance with the DAF.
  • The former CEO entered into a material agreement for R326-million with a consultant in September 2006, even though he did not have the authority to do so.
  • No corrective action had been taken by EXCO to address deficiencies in the acquisition of international program content, despite the advice of a forensic investigation in August 2007.
  • Irregularities of R111,75-million relating to:
    • Double payments
    • Overpayments
    • Material paid for but not received
    • Agreements that had to be renegotiated
    • Program titles acquired more than once, from the same supplier.
  • Concerns and detailed findings were brought to the attention of the Acting group CEO in September 2008, but NO corrective actions were implemented!
  • R11,3-million was paid to a private travel company (instead of SABC Travel Office), in contravention of the SABC's travel policy.
  • SABC board members and Execs who travelled with their partners to the Olympic Games were liable for tax arising from the fringe benefits in terms of the Income Tax Act - however, payroll was not notified of the benefits so did not levy the tax to execs or board members.
  • An "environment where management and those responsible for oversight were perceived as being indecisive" and contributed to an organisational culture of "impunity".

THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS WILL:

* Conduct a thorough assessment and clearly define roles of and the authority allocated to executive and/or senior managers.

* Review Human Resource policies and implementation thereof.

* Review benefits applicable to management in particular and staff in general.

* Review policies governing the involvement of employees in private business activities.

* Requesting monthly management accounts from the SABC.

* Active and permanent shareholder participation in the various committees of the SABC board, i.e. Risk, Audit and Internal Audit Committees.

* Ensuring that all major decisions, financial or otherwise, have the full approval of the Group Executive Committee, the Board of Directors and the Shareholder.

* General compliance with the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA).

* Require monthly operational reports to monitor implementation.

* Conduct a need analysis of SABC channels to determine the type and amount of content they require.

* Monitor the implementation of the local content quota and conduct a thorough assessment of the need for and the acquisition of international content and ensuring that content is used.

CALL TO ACTION:

Please assist the Ministry in understanding the reasons it took such a long time for this sad state of affairs to surface.

The Ministry of Communications will thoroughly scrutinize previous reports of the Auditor General and SABC internal and external auditors.

* * PLEASE CONTACT THE MINISTRY IF YOU ARE AWARE OF ANY OLD REPORTS THAT HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED BY EXCO AND HR. * *

Where transgressions are found to have been committed (especially covering up), law enforcement agencies will move swiftly in bringing the perpetrators to book.

Ministerial Statement:
The SABC is a crucial institution of our democracy and everything should be done to save it from further ruin. It is the main and reliable source of information and entertainment services for the public, particularly the needy, providing broadcasting services to 24 million people on a daily basis.

We are encouraged by the conclusion of the process of selecting members of the SABC Board, pending the ratification of the recommended candidates by the President. We believe that this is a major milestone that will undoubtedly create an enabling environment for the efficient implementation of the recovery measures for the SABC.

We are equally grateful for the sterling work done by the interim board since it took office almost three months ago under challenging conditions.

PS: Mr Minister - why not thank the Shop Stewards? Surely their personal sacrifices (without expectation of reward) to expose this rot should count for more than the unhelpful "Interimmers"? - who has done nothing to put a stop to whistleblower victimisation?

Joyous News!

The SABC Board has a unionist! At last, the People of South Africa has Hope for Empowerment (real and genuine Empowerment). Now, EXCO must be swopped for real human beings as well. Viva the People's Broadcaster Viva!

High Salaries Attract Parasites

We call upon Parliament and Board to attract dedicated management to the National Broadcaster.

There is a way that dedicated people with a genuine passion for broadcasting will come work at the SABC, and through which the parasites, who care nothing for Public Broadcasting, will hopefully leave the cash cow.

Remove the obscene cash incentive. Let Good Broadcasting be the attraction - not easy money.

Cut EXCO salaries. They are obscene. Obscene salaries attract only obscene fat cats.

The last dedicated DG (CEO) we had was appointed in January 1994, at a salary of R169,000. The CPI in January 1994 was 40, compared with 2008's 100.

That means a (2008 equivalent) salary of R442,000-00. Advertise the CEO position at 10% more than that (2009 increase) - R486,200-00 - and you will be guaranteed to attract a dedicated Public Broadcaster.

It would mean reducing the GM, CE salaries to somewhat below these levels as well. Those who are here just for the money, must then go find another job.

Highly skilled specialists are willing to work for R250k - R350k. Why can't the Top 150 do the same? The savings will be enormous - around R50m per year! And broadcasting will be done with love and care.

Viva CWU Viva!

1016 members!

Commercial Enterprises = 118 members
Content Enterprises = 98 members
Group Services = 103 members
News = 338 members
PBS = 101 members
PCS = 29 members
Regional Ops = 32 members
Technology Division = 197 members

Auckland Park = 718
Limpopo = 57
Eastern Cape = 52
Pretoria = 48
Western Cape = 37
Kimberley = 32
Bloemfontein = 21
Mmabatho = 19
Nelspruit = 17
KZN = 15

Comrades, with a bit of more work, we can become 50%+1 soon. Let us explain to all non union members how important that is.

Vocal Shop Stewards and the price they pay

Even while S&M Shop Steward and CWU Provincial Gender Co-ordinator, Janine Murison, tirelessly fights for justice and principle in court, almost every shop steward who questions management's exploitative pratices, gets victimised by SABC Management. Please comment on suggestions on how to put a stop to this.

Cde Rian's DC

Charges
- Inciting friction between Staff and Top Management
- Sending "Information" about Top Management to Parliament
- Sending an e-mail asking all staff to join unions, on a "corporate template"
- "Enjoying" the rights afforded to a Shop Steward, while not being one

Panel
- Alan Visser (has fired more than 20 people - most cases disputed at CCMA + Labour Court)
- Tseliso Leballo (has fired many people - also disputed)
- Merlyn Ashen - HR (Sport, at which CWU members have received bad HR service)

Tommy has disputed the panel chair (Alan Visser) as biased, due to previous experiences with him. CWU now declared a dispute over the interpretration of the Disciplinary Code clause that says a panel must "be seen to be as objective as possible"!

The CCMA shall soon provide us with a date. It is high time that the SABC learns to stick to it's own rules. We undertake to defend the mandate we were given to protect out Shop Stewards!

The hearing will continue on 2 September. It looks like it may stretch for months. There are many witnesses. We need also to line up our own witnesses soon. Please contact Tommy, Billy, Mimi or Aaron if you have had any matter dealt with by Cde Rian in the past 2 years, so you can be added to the witness list.

You have the right to unionise and to fight stupidity.

Are you willing to defend the organisational rights of the union?

Can Cde Rian expect a fair hearing from these SABC managers?

By refusing to see our value, the SABC negotiators are:

Who currently keeps the SABC on air?

SEF has convinced Jane Duncan (freedom of expression champion) to accept our nomination, only if it comes from us

The counter proposal is:

Should CWU/MWASA refer the "agreement" signed by "SMS ballot" to CCMA for adjudication?

The letter to SABC Board is hereby:

Who can save the SABC?

What is the main reason you will strike?

What should the Minister do to stop the strike?

Who should we negotiate with?

Important Vote - Build the SABC

When you vote on this blog, your views are seen by the Minister, New Board, Exco, SMF, SOS campaign, TVIEC, ICASA, and the owners - the People of South Africa.

ONLY VOTE ONCE!, When it is the square tickboxes, first select ALL the blocks you agree with, then press "Vote".

ALL COMRADES MUST PLEASE VOTE! - pass it on - Shop Steward Janine Murison has been denied an opportunity to present the truth in Labour Court. Please mandate the Way Forward:

Which of the following are most responsible for the financial freefall at the SABC?

For Waste, Secrecy, Arrogance, and (Allegations), we Demand the Suspension and Invesigation of:

What is the best type of increase for you?

Who should resign?

Should SABC EXCO refuse our demands, will you: