Open letter to SABC Board Chairperson

Dear Ms Irene Charnley, Interim Chairperson of SABC Board

Kindly note that this is written to you on behalf of, and mandated by, the majority of unionised employees at the SABC, whatever their affiliation. Our administrators have included a confirmation widget for members to visibly confirm this letter.

Yesterday's march, attended by half of the union members at Auckland Park (we have an exact count, using our photos), with the other half caringly keeping our critical services going, to minimise financial impact. Should we have asked them to join us, it might have caused a break in transmission, and we did not want that right now.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

  • COSATU, FEDUSA, CWU, CWUSA, FXI, SOLA, TVIEC and others in the SOS Coalition has made it clear they do not endorse the new Interim Board, until further notice, and particularly because their nominees was ignored by a very hasty Parliament.
  • The above means that the conduct of each board member will be monitored closely by the Shop Stewards of the above, as there is no clear endorsement from our federations.
  • We fully realise that you were a practiced and skilled negotiator with the National Union of Mineworkers, another COSATU affilliate. This in no way should lead you to believe your conduct will now be under less scrutiny than that of any other board member.

OUR SERIOUS CONCERNS (The Unionised Staff of the SABC)

We are seriously concerned over the following events of the past two days:

  1. Our chosen point of contact, the secretariat of the CWU Head Office, wrote a letter to the SABC, responding to an invitation for a meeting with your good selves.
  2. The response politely, but clearly, declined your invitation, as it was on very short notice.
  3. Notwitstanding this, the SABC still deemed it fit to invite some union members and junior officials to the meeting with you.
  4. We now state, without ambiguity, that the two meetings you've had (with what the SABC may now describe as "with the unions"), was in fact unprocudural.
  5. It's our understanding that the members that did attend, were there for information purposes only.
  6. This perturbs us. You repeated to them the same words that the SABC EXCO have repeated to us Ad Nauseam for such a long time: "We only have 8.5%."

We are now very concerned that you seem not to understand us. Please therefore allow us to make ourselves very clear:

We know the SABC only left 8.5%" in our Salary Account.

We want the rest of our promised 12.2% to be returned by the individuals who removed it from our Salary Account.

They had NO right to raid our Salary Account. It is a worker's most treasured right - to be paid his agreed upon salary. Anything less is clearly frowned upon by the law authorities - so much so that heavy fines are imposed for short payments.

No amount of "economic hardship" can justify anyone taking money out of a worker's Salary Account. It is as taboo as robbing a grave.

We've allowed the SABC to open negotiations on this matter. In the interests of Good Faith bargaining, we've levelled a simple request - please safeguard our Salary Account for the future.

This would mean suspending all those who are suspected of having squandered the money in our Salary Account, to be investigated and procedurally charged - using the existing Audit Reports. If needed, they must be procecuted, and their assets attached for return of the money to our Salary Account.

Up to date, we have had no success with EXCO to get this legal request to ensure Good Faith bargaining fulfilled.

We now call upon you to please not meet with junior officials on an Ad Hoc basis.

Our elected Official point of contact is Comrade Gallant Roberts, the General Secretary of the Communication Workers Union.

Kindly extend a proper invitation to him - with a proper time period allowed - to enable us, via the CWU Secretariat (which has been democratically elected by us to co-ordinate) both at this plant and at the CWU HQ, to consolidate our agenda points properly.

We aim to input constructively, with the aims of safeguarding not only the future of the SABC, but the entire Broadcast Industry, which employs around 100 000 people.

The meeting, when it does happen, promises to clarify many things that have been muddied by haphazard meetings at short notice.



Our position remains one of Good Labour Relations

The Unionised Staff of the SABC, via the hand of the CWU Secretariat.

15 comments:

  1. Anonymous15/7/09

    These people are despicable. Like locusts. And the profits generated by Matlare? also gobbled up I suppose. Lucky they can't touch our pensions or those would also have dissapeared.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous15/7/09

    Matlare? He was not great, either. He brought Robin Nicholson from Primedia. He took away our freelance numbers and thus our opportunities to Multiskill and Grow.

    He also illegally and inhumanely took away the post retirement benefits of senior citizens, causing untold suffering.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous15/7/09

    Rian,'s note letter to Irene Charnely the Interim Board Chairperson is of more importance that Matlare (who is gone).
    Comrade Rian, you letter is noted and endorsed by me. It is well written in layman's terms and to the point.
    thank you comrade

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous15/7/09

    Rian this is very well written - just change THAM to THEM in the second paragraph. You have my endorsement to send this to her

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous15/7/09

    I fully support the letter - it seems like management (including the new board) still use the same tactics, trying to cause division by inviting the 'wrong' participants as well as delaying tactics, by now saying they will only respond in three weeks!!!

    on the strategic level our GS GALLANT ROBERTS is the candidate to represent us..

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous15/7/09

    do we already have a problem with the new interim board?
    Irene Charnley knows all about Unions so we need to keep a close eye on her.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous15/7/09

    Good one Rian, let's stick together and fight this corruption. How do sleep at night? They are despicable, God must please forgive me how I feel about them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous18/7/09

    Rian, why did u not tell us you suspended?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I received my suspension letter from Richard Waghorn, CE Technology, only at 17:00 on Friday. I had to pack. This is the first opportunity I had to get to a computer.

    I hope this does not deter the rest of you to continue fighting for your money.

    I would not like to see this distract anyone. I suggest that a new co-ordinator be elected as soon as possible, though, as I can no loger help.

    Rian

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous21/7/09

    Rian, What can we do to assist you? Do you have a legal advisor? Is CWU going to assist you in your case after all you are a CWU member. Can they proof the allegations against you? I have all these question and need answers.
    You need not worry that we will not continue fighting. Although Bemawu has pulled out, CWU and MWASA will continue the fight.
    VIVA COMRADE RIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. From Admin: Note that BEMAWU has not actually "pulled out". They will still strike in sympathy with us if the outstanding audit reports are not heeded by Gab Mampone soon.

    Rian has been called to HQ tomorrow, he shall probably update us at about 13:00 or so, then we shall post the news here...

    ReplyDelete
  12. OK, so HQ did not do much about Rian's matter. Vulture told Rian to "stay under the radar" for now.

    Any thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous23/7/09

    We should leave any actions up to the General Secretary. I am sure that is what Cde Vulture and Cde Gallant means.

    Cde Rian is still quite capable of mobilising from outside - so for now, there is no reason to panic.

    More importantly, what do we do about members that lie and concoct false rumours behind his back, for reasons unknown?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous24/7/09

    As long as we know what's true and what's not. This blog is the perfect forum to get information from. Ben seems to know well informed and I'm sure he can keep us update.
    Vulture may have told Rian to "stay under the radar"let us not read much into it or draw assumptions from this. Ben what do you make of this?
    Vulture might have a point, besides Comrade Rian is not one to take things lying down. I'm sure he is very active in this fight of ours.
    Comrade Ben please give us as much info as you're able to.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Subsequent enquiries has shown that Cde Vulture meant to say that Cde Rian should leave the action, for the moment, in the hands of the union - to prove the union is all of us. An injury to one, is an injury to ALL. I shall post any official union correspondence in this regard, on the blog, as soon as I receive it.

    As far as we have been able to ascertain, HQ is sure that the SABC will soon experience the full might of COSATU mobilisation. It is therefore quite foolish for the SABC to suspend a person for excersising his constitutional right to mobilise union members - all three charges are forms of collective bargaining.

    I am by no means the only reliable source of info - I have a day job to perform in between as well. I hope to entice Rian, and all the other Shop Stewards to write on this blog too.

    It is an OPEN forum, comrades - please - if you know anything (besides strategic info), write it here on this open forum.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Are you willing to defend the organisational rights of the union?

Can Cde Rian expect a fair hearing from these SABC managers?

By refusing to see our value, the SABC negotiators are:

Who currently keeps the SABC on air?

SEF has convinced Jane Duncan (freedom of expression champion) to accept our nomination, only if it comes from us

The counter proposal is:

Should CWU/MWASA refer the "agreement" signed by "SMS ballot" to CCMA for adjudication?

The letter to SABC Board is hereby:

Who can save the SABC?

What is the main reason you will strike?

What should the Minister do to stop the strike?

Who should we negotiate with?

Important Vote - Build the SABC

When you vote on this blog, your views are seen by the Minister, New Board, Exco, SMF, SOS campaign, TVIEC, ICASA, and the owners - the People of South Africa.

ONLY VOTE ONCE!, When it is the square tickboxes, first select ALL the blocks you agree with, then press "Vote".

ALL COMRADES MUST PLEASE VOTE! - pass it on - Shop Steward Janine Murison has been denied an opportunity to present the truth in Labour Court. Please mandate the Way Forward:

Which of the following are most responsible for the financial freefall at the SABC?

For Waste, Secrecy, Arrogance, and (Allegations), we Demand the Suspension and Invesigation of:

What is the best type of increase for you?

Who should resign?

Should SABC EXCO refuse our demands, will you: