Questionable agreement

CWU, MWASA and many disgruntled members of an individual (????????) - who believes same individual used unconstitutional, secret, and unmonitored "SMS voting" as a tool to protect a corrupt management - strongly objects to the opportunism in clause 6.2 especially, as well as over the legality of the so-called "SMS" mandate, for which there are no constitutional grounds. We call on all members who used to be fooled by this undemocratic individual to join real unions with definite, legal, and constitutional collective bargaining records.

Here is the "agreement".

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN
THE SOUTH AFRICAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION LIMITED
( HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "THE SABC" )
AND
???????

1. OBJECTIVE

1.1 To provide for the annual general salary adjustment for employees for the financial year 2009/10.

2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION

2.1 This agreement will be applicable to:

2.2.1 Employees who are employed by the SABC falling within the bargaining unit (scale codes 300-409) and those employees appointed in terms of fixed term contracts (scale code 600) falling within the bargaining unit;

2.2.2 Who are members in good standing of ??????; and

2.2 The scope of this agreement excludes employees employed in terms of fixed terms contracts (scale code 900 ).

3. SALARY ADJUSTMENT

3.1 ??????? members in the bargaining unit as referred to in clause 2 above, will receive eight point five (8.5) % (percent) salary adjustment across the board (ATB) for the financial year 2009/10 and back paid to 1 April 2009; and

3.2 The referred to salary adjustment will be effected within five (5) days upon signing of this agreement.

4. DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION

4.1 This agreement shall come into effect on the date of signature hereof and shall remain in force until 31 March 2010, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties hereto in writing.

5. STATUS OF AGREEMENT

5.1 The parties furthermore agree that this agreement will constitute an amendment to the provisions of the Multi Term Agreement dated 8 July 2008 and therefore does not impact on the validity of the provisions of the Multi Term Agreement referred to above in any other manner.

6. FURTHER CONDITIONS

6.1 The parties furthermore specifically agree as follows:

6.1.1 The demand from ??????? for an additional one point

five (1.5) % salary increment to be effected, is subject to SABC

Board feedback in this regard and same will be given to ??????? on Friday 31 July 2009;

6.1.2 That the parties will negotiate on how the remaining two point two (2.2) % salary increment could be utilised in respect of ???????? members.

6.1.3 That the SABC agrees to follow process to:

6.1.3.1 Scale down the petrol card and maintenance of car expenses of Top & Senior Managers;

6.1.3.2 Scale down on DSTV allowances for Top & Senior Managers to employees that really need it for the execution of their duties;

6.1.3.3 Scale down on free newspapers for Top & Senior Managers to employees that really need it for the execution of their duties;

6.1.3.4 Review the processes mentioned in 6.1.3.1 to 6.1.3.3, on an ongoing basis, with a view to restoring or phasing out the benefits completely, subject to the financial well being of the SABC and the availability of funds.

6.1.3.4 That the SABC will take immediate action in terms of the Public Finance Management Act to sue and to criminally prosecute, where applicable employees guilty of fruitless and wasteful expenditure including fraud, theft and other unauthorized financial losses.

6.1.4 That the investigation currently being conducted by the Auditor General to continue to its logic conclusion and that the parties will at all times co-operate in this regard. All outstanding Internal Audit Reports will also receive management’s urgent attention and action;

6.1.5 ?????? agrees to provisionally withdraw the dispute referred to the CCMA in respect of the salary increases which has been set down for 12 August 2009. Should the SABC be in breach of any of the clauses of this agreement, the parties agree that ??????? may re-enroll its dispute for arbitration as per the current referral to the CCMA for arbitration;

6.1.6 Should the feedback from the SABC Board be that the SABC will not effect a further one point five (1.5) % then BEMAWU has the right to proceed with its dispute set down for 12 August 2009 at the CCMA to effect the full twelve point two (12.2)%.

6.2 Should any other employee receive a better increase or better conditions as reflected in this agreement, those better increases and/or condition(s) will be extended automatically to ??????? members as well.

7. INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION

7.1 In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this agreement and any other agreement, the provisions of this agreement shall take precedence; and

7.2 No amendments to this agreement shall be in force unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties.

8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

8.1 Should there be a dispute about the interpretation or application of this agreement, any party may refer the dispute to the Council for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) for adjudication.

14 comments:

  1. Anonymous31/7/09

    Nothing changed! Did they really sign this?????

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous31/7/09

    They really signed. We (MWASA and CWU) get fooled by that conman every time!

    Forget it! They going down!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous31/7/09

    So you thought Mugabe - El Predidente for LIFE was bad wait till you meet the conman president of ???????. He has elected himself to the position of "PAID" president of the so called "triade" union for many years now, something that does not exist in the constitution of that??????? union. OOOOOOPS what constitution does one exist - try finding it - I doubt you will. The position of union president is filled by election and that has not happened for many years now. El Presidente rules the ???????union like his own fifedom and no one can depose him cos there are no elections. Where's the democracy in this.
    ?????????? members were polled by SMS - there were feedback on the mandate - there was just a signing - shame they (?????? members)were hoodwinked - again.
    They cannot criticize the thieving SABC Management as they are in bed with them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous31/7/09

    You are a bunch of fools. BEMAWU is the ONLY professional union at the SABC that has vision and understand these things. You have NEVER balloted us, but instead intimidated us to strike. I am resigned from the Circus Workers Union from this moment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous31/7/09

    OK. But with this new commitment to 10% - why didn't they do it at the start? Oh, I remember, they did but are serial liars - are we not making some headway? Can we work from this?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous31/7/09

    We can work from this. If someone steals money out of your piggy bank, they must bring it back.

    Greedy pigs fed at our trough - all we can really do now is to slaughter them and sell them for bacon.

    About ?????? - the problem is that an "sms vote" is simply not legal. Estoppel dictates that this one person can simply decide for members, and no one will be the wiser.

    I challenge ?????? to take a democratic, monitored ballot whether members think it's ok to be stolen from, and the thieves get away with it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous31/7/09

    I think our President should start a union for Managers only. Unfortunately he has again shown that he only has their interests at heart. What a disappointment.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous1/8/09

    I doubt whether even managers are foolish enough to participate in an autocracy. Even their agenda will not be respected - only his own agenda

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous1/8/09

    Union for managers a good idea. Those 300 scales who try to bust the strike by using scabs, also benefit when we get better increase. Is that crazy?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous1/8/09

    Our agreement must EXCLUDE non union members!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have been reliably informed that a Closed Agency Agreement will be put in place very soon. That will mean the Bargaining Forum will receive dues from non union members as well - no more free rides.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous6/8/09

    In terms of the Labour Relations Act, No 66 of 1995 every registered trade union must ballot its members before embarking on a strike. Hereunder the exact wording of the Act.

    Section 95 (5) (p) The constitution of any trade union or employers' organisation that intends to register must-provide that the trade union or employers' organisation, before calling a strike or lock-out, must conduct a ballot of those of its members in respect of whom it intends to call the strike or lock-out;

    A ballot is not secret, only a member’s vote is secret. The reason for that is very simple. It protects a member from victimisation, intimidation and being called a sell-out and other ugly things. It furthermore enables a member as an individual to exercise a right in privacy and to give effect to democracy, where the majority decision will count.

    BEMAWU balloted its members several times during this salary dispute. Not only did we do this electronically, but also via a paper ballot. We did this because we cannot accept and consider it as a mandate to proceed with a strike when a mandate was obtained (by the other two unions) in the following circumstances:

    · A meeting of all three unions is called jointly, and it is attended by mixed membership (Nothing wrong with the joined meeting, but no means to establish a mandate per individual union)
    · No attendance registered is kept of who attended,
    · The meeting is attended by between 120 and 150 members out of a possible 2200 members,
    · In Cape Town for instance, due to the size of the venue only 3 or 4 people attended,
    · At the end of the meeting members are asked, by show of hands who supports a strike, and initially only a few people put up their hands. When the loud ones in the meeting started to shout and look around more people put up their hands. (We do not suggest this method, as an initial indicator does not have its place, but most definitely it can never replace a proper balloting process)
    · No other union balloted its members, which off course in unconstitutional (but no longer a legal requirement).

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous6/8/09

    BEMAWU is a professional, technological advanced and democratic union. We at all times attempt to test a decision with the members. At times we as the leadership have to make decisions. Decisions we know is in the best interest of our members. In this salary dispute we have NOT exercised that option to make a decision, but opted to ballot you every time things have changed. All our members have cell phones. Cell phones are used by everyone in modern days for competitions and voting.

    To vote via sms have various benefits. Votes can be counted electronically, and is available immediately. The votes are held by someone else, in our instance Vodacom, as it sits on their servers. In terms of the Companies Act they must keep those records for at least a period of five (5) years. It can be accessed at any time and be downloaded for auditing. It is not a 100% ideal, but no system is. Each vote will only reflects a cell number, and not a name. The electronic counting filters out duplicate votes and does not count spoilt votes, i.e when the sms asks to vote “Accept” or “Reject” and you vote “Yes” it will count it as a spoilt vote, because no one would know if the “yes” is for “accept” or “reject”. It is set up to only count one of the key words you are required to sms back. You can vote from any place in the world, and don’t have to be at the meeting to cast a vote.

    With the paper ballots we had in this salary dispute only 30% of our members voted. With the electronic voting, at times as much as 70% of members voted.

    The voting in this salary dispute was monitored by the negations team and individual members of the National Executive and National Structure of BEMAWU. It will also be submitted to our auditors to report on same in our annual financial statements as to whether the communicated vote is supported by the sms’s received.

    Although the voting by sms is a transparent process, we will at all times guarantee that your vote remains secret and we will never tell anyone who is not authorised by law to know how you voted.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous6/8/09

    I personally have no problem with SMS voting, should such a vote follow a long debate.

    However, let us be frank - those who do not attend meetings, can not be expected to make informed decisions.

    An SMS vote on the spur of the moment is not necessarily wrong, but it can also not be ideal.

    Why the haste?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Are you willing to defend the organisational rights of the union?

Can Cde Rian expect a fair hearing from these SABC managers?

By refusing to see our value, the SABC negotiators are:

Who currently keeps the SABC on air?

SEF has convinced Jane Duncan (freedom of expression champion) to accept our nomination, only if it comes from us

The counter proposal is:

Should CWU/MWASA refer the "agreement" signed by "SMS ballot" to CCMA for adjudication?

The letter to SABC Board is hereby:

Who can save the SABC?

What is the main reason you will strike?

What should the Minister do to stop the strike?

Who should we negotiate with?

Important Vote - Build the SABC

When you vote on this blog, your views are seen by the Minister, New Board, Exco, SMF, SOS campaign, TVIEC, ICASA, and the owners - the People of South Africa.

ONLY VOTE ONCE!, When it is the square tickboxes, first select ALL the blocks you agree with, then press "Vote".

ALL COMRADES MUST PLEASE VOTE! - pass it on - Shop Steward Janine Murison has been denied an opportunity to present the truth in Labour Court. Please mandate the Way Forward:

Which of the following are most responsible for the financial freefall at the SABC?

For Waste, Secrecy, Arrogance, and (Allegations), we Demand the Suspension and Invesigation of:

What is the best type of increase for you?

Who should resign?

Should SABC EXCO refuse our demands, will you: