"Interkom/Intercom" belongs to staff

Dear Comrades, Brothers and Sisters

Note that, using the SABC breakfast program, an unprocedural communication was made to staff, regarding a "subject to approval" 1.5% that may (or may not be), available in October.

We are also aware of a communication from a certain individual in Corporate Communications, who claim we are "mischievious" by forwarding mails that come from one of their staff members.

We have placed on record that no communication from the much abused mouthpiece of EXCO (an email adress named "corporate communications" can be trusted any longer. We also note that 90% of staff in any case delete mail from that address without reading it. Those records were available from the IT department, until the senders stopped requesting "read receipts".

Note that the logos "Interkom" and "Intercom" are the intellectual property of the staff of the SABC. A contest was launched in the last century, to get a new name for the "staff magazine". Individuals who now suddenly call themselves the owners of the logo "Interkom/Intercom" would be well advised to go and check who created the name, and so establish which "individuals" it really belongs to. The creators of the name/logo/brand selflessly then allowed all SABC staff to share in this Intellectual Property "Interkom". The moral owner of the logo (SABC staff) now demand that the individual who has access to the e-mail address named "corporate communications", desist from abusing our logo, and hand it back to the staff, to whom it legally belongs.

IGNORE FALSE CONTENT OF EMAILS

There was, for example, the communication in June 2008, that stated our salaries would be 12.2% more from 1 April 2009. That turned out to be misleading. Clearly then, no communication from that source should be allowed by the SABC.

We call on SABC BIT department to deny that department access to our e-mail system, as false information cause serious disruption.

This offer was not made to our leaders in a properly constituted bargaining forum.

Clearly EXCO is continuing with what they have resolved to do when they made it clear to labour court the day after we got our Strike Certificate - Refuse to Bargain.

We are certain that the (real) SABC does not agree with this reprehensible conduct by EXCO.

At the moment, the (real) SABC's only representative is the Minister of Comminications, at least until such time the President signs the (Interim) Board into place.

When we picket today, between 13:00 and 14:00, know you are lobbying the Minister.

Exco does not represent the SABC. A motion of no confidence in "EXCO" was tabled by the SABC Organised Labour Alliance on 2 June 2009.

Kindly ignore all messages from entities named "Corporate Communications", as well has any letters from "EXCO".

Kindly only trust communications coming from the Minister, the SABC Board, or the SABC Organised Labour Alliance.

Ours position remains one of Good Labour Relations

SABC Organised Labour Alliance

7 comments:

  1. Anonymous10/7/09

    phambili!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10/7/09

    Comrade - the SABC belongs to the public, not the liars! They must give up, apologise and go retire on their swiss accounts!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous10/7/09

    Our logo is not the only thing these arrogant individuals took from us - they have taken our dignity, and they have made us their enemies.

    Comrade Rian, please do not fall into their ugly trap of mudslinging, we will strike for you, to make sure the ugly agression by "management" stops!

    In return for their foolish notions that they can call our elected leaders "mischievous individuals", or threaten them, we shall provide them with black on air, and the most crippling strike in history...

    No TV, no Email, no SMS's no cell calls, no landline calls - nothing!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous11/7/09

    Comrade Rian

    You must stay strong for us - you saw the thousand or more supporters outside.

    You are right, i myself delete every piece of junk mail that comes from "corporate communications"

    Phanzi corporate Phanzi! Phanzi Mr communications Phanzi!

    Viva organised labour viva

    Viva post polokwane ANC viva!
    Phanzi Mbeki-ists Phanzi!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous13/7/09

    I did not realise people even read corporate communications. I delete it as well as throw the in-house magazine in the trash without even glancing at it. It appears on my desk every so often. what a waste. Does anyone know how much the magazine cost to print with it's glossy paper.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous13/7/09

    Apparently that it is about R3m per run. Crazy. A newspaper with 10 000 run costs around R300 000, less than a tenth! No wonder they can't pay us!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous14/7/09

    Would the answer to whom has the "authority" to use the logo, be taken up in the "delegation of authority" document?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Are you willing to defend the organisational rights of the union?

Can Cde Rian expect a fair hearing from these SABC managers?

By refusing to see our value, the SABC negotiators are:

Who currently keeps the SABC on air?

SEF has convinced Jane Duncan (freedom of expression champion) to accept our nomination, only if it comes from us

The counter proposal is:

Should CWU/MWASA refer the "agreement" signed by "SMS ballot" to CCMA for adjudication?

The letter to SABC Board is hereby:

Who can save the SABC?

What is the main reason you will strike?

What should the Minister do to stop the strike?

Who should we negotiate with?

Important Vote - Build the SABC

When you vote on this blog, your views are seen by the Minister, New Board, Exco, SMF, SOS campaign, TVIEC, ICASA, and the owners - the People of South Africa.

ONLY VOTE ONCE!, When it is the square tickboxes, first select ALL the blocks you agree with, then press "Vote".

ALL COMRADES MUST PLEASE VOTE! - pass it on - Shop Steward Janine Murison has been denied an opportunity to present the truth in Labour Court. Please mandate the Way Forward:

Which of the following are most responsible for the financial freefall at the SABC?

For Waste, Secrecy, Arrogance, and (Allegations), we Demand the Suspension and Invesigation of:

What is the best type of increase for you?

Who should resign?

Should SABC EXCO refuse our demands, will you: